英语辩论赛辩论稿【优秀4篇】

英语辩论赛辩论稿 篇一：电子书是否应取代传统纸质书

尊敬的评委、亲爱的听众们：

我代表正方团队，我将在今天的辩论赛上为电子书取代传统纸质书这一立场进行辩论。

首先，我想强调电子书的便利性。随着科技的发展，电子设备正在普及，人们可以通过手机、平板电脑等设备随时随地阅读电子书。这使得电子书在空间和时间上都具备了传统纸质书无法比拟的优势。无论是在公共交通上还是在家中，人们都可以方便地阅读电子书，不再受到书籍数量和重量的限制。此外，电子书还可以通过网络下载，无需等待邮寄或亲自购买。这样，人们可以立即获取他们想要的书籍，大大节省了时间和精力。

其次，电子书带来了更好的阅读体验。电子书的屏幕可以调节亮度和字体大小，以适应不同的阅读环境和个人需求。此外，电子书还可以提供一系列的交互功能，如搜索、书签、笔记等，使阅读更加便捷和个性化。这些功能使得电子书成为了一种更加互动和丰富的阅读方式，让读者能够更好地沉浸于书籍中，更好地理解和消化内容。

最后，电子书对环境保护具有积极作用。传统纸质书的生产需要大量的木材和能源，而且会产生大量的二氧化碳排放和废弃物。而电子书的制作仅需少量的电子元件和材料，大大减少了资源的消耗和环境的污染。电子书的普及可以为环境保护作出贡献，减少森林砍伐和环境污染，有利于可持续发展。

尽管电子书有很多优势，但我们也要承认传统纸质书的价值。纸质书给人们带来了独特的触感和氛围，书籍的香味和翻页的声音都是无法被电子书所替代的。此外，纸质书更加可靠，电子设备可能遭受病毒攻击或损坏，导致书籍内容的丢失。

综上所述，虽然传统纸质书有其独特的魅力，但电子书的便利性、阅读体验和环境保护的优势使其成为了一种不可忽视的阅读方式。我代表正方团队坚信电子书应该取代传统纸质书，带来更好的阅读体验和环境保护。谢谢！

英语辩论赛辩论稿 篇二：手机是否应该在学校中禁用

尊敬的评委、亲爱的听众们：

我代表反方团队，我将在今天的辩论赛上为手机在学校中禁用这一立场进行辩论。

首先，我想强调手机的教育价值。如今的手机不仅仅是通信工具，更是一种信息和知识的载体。学生可以通过手机上的各种学习应用程序获取丰富的教育资源，如电子书、教育视频和在线课程等。手机还可以帮助学生进行学习计划和时间管理，提高学习效率。因此，禁用手机可能会剥夺学生获取教育资源和利用手机进行学习的机会。

其次，手机可以作为学生与家长和老师沟通的工具。学生在学校中使用手机可以方便地与家长和老师保持联系，及时沟通学习和生活的问题。这种联系可以增强家校合作，促进学生的发展和学习成绩的提高。如果禁用手机，学生可能会面临与家长和老师沟通困难的问题，导致信息传递的延迟和不畅，影响学生的学习和生活。

最后，手机在紧急情况下可以提供安全保障。学生在学校中使用手机可以随时联系家长和亲友，以应对突发事件和危险情况。特别是在灾难和紧急情况下，手机可以成为学生们生命和财产安全的重要保障。如果禁用手机，学生可能会失去紧急联系的渠道，增加了安全风险。

尽管手机在学校中存在一些问题，如分散注意力和侵犯他人隐私等，但我们也要承认手机在教育和安全方面的积极作用。禁用手机可能会剥夺学生获取教育资源、与家长和老师沟通以及应对紧急情况的机会。

综上所述，尽管手机在学校中存在一些问题，但其教育价值、沟通作用和安全保障使其不能完全被禁用。我代表反方团队坚信手机应该在学校中被允许使用，以促进学生的学习和发展。谢谢！

英语辩论赛辩论稿 篇三

　　Good evening，Ladies and gentlemen.

　　According to the law, every single inpidual is born with the right to keep living. Since death is just a part of life, to suggest that it is a right is to grant that it is a freedom to decide when and where to give up this kind of right. In a manner of speaking, it is a man’s right to commit suicide.

　　Again, we can find in the OXFord Advanced Learner’s English-Chinese dictionary the explanation of “suicide”----the act of killing oneself intentionally----which indicates that suicide is simply a libertarian movement for human freedom and the right of making choices. It is the law’s duty to protect human’s freedom and the right of making choices.

　　While it is without doubt that suicide, in reality, is human’s right, there main argument remain:

　　1,Maybe some people will say that the primary purpose of human being is to live, so suicide is inhumane and totally against the standard of ethic;

　　2,Suicide is criminal offense because it involves the killing of a person;

　　3,The people who commits suicide is irrespondsable to those who love him, even if it is a physical and mental realse to himself.

　　However, an evidence to sustain the first argument is difficult to obtain.It is common sense to note that Modern medicine has its own limitation and can not cure all the existing diseases.In spite of the extraordinary progress made in Modern medicine, problems remain in terms of guaranteeing that all the pains due to illness can be reduced to a tolerant level. As a result of this, at least in the near future, there must be some illnesses which can not be treated, some pains which are uncontrollable, some people who are terminally ill. Maybe the primary purpose of an ordinary and healthy human being is to live, but what if the person we are talking about is a terminally ill patient whose remaining time is no more than a series of suffering . Neither the law nor medical ethics requires “everything be done” to keep a person alive. However, insistnece, against the patient’s wishes, that death be postponed by every means available is contrary to law and practice. It would also be cruel and inhumane. There comes a time when continued attempts to cure are not compassionate, wise or medically sound. That’s where only euthanasia can be of use. Voluntary euthanasia,which is another form of suicide, is human, because it brings mental and physical release to the patient and his family and helps to put an ultimate end to the torment of a termnally ill patient by hastening his death when he has no prospect of recovering. Extending an incurably sick patient’s life means the same as aggravating the pain . It is unnecessory to maintain life artificially beyond the point when people will never regain consciousness. Because effort should not be made to perpetuate what has become a meanless existence.

　　Others may argue that “suicide is criminal offense because it involves the killing of a person”. Indeed, killing another person is a kind of serious criminal offense which we call “murder”. However, what we are talkig about is “suicide”, not “murder”. Do they realise there is a big difference between the lives of our own and the lives of other people? Since it is our own life, we have the right to decide in what way the life meets its end. If not ,what is the difference gonna be? For instance, you are guity of keeping other people’s possession without permition. Because you are stealing the things which do not belong to you. But when it comes to your own possession, that it is to say, when you keep your own possession or even use it in a way that will probably destroy it,no one would consider you as guity.So, Sustaining the idea of “suicide is criminal offense” is as ridiculous as saying that a person is guity of using his own possession in a destructive way. In the case of suicide, there is no victims, let alone the so-called criminal offense.

　　With regard to the last argument----”the people who commit suicide ,even if it is a physical and mental realse to himself, is irresponsable to the people who really love him”----the argument itself, ironically is in some sense to abmit that suicide is a physical and mental realse. But what they fail to realise is that the kind of release is not just to the one who commit suicide, but also to his family.It is a terminally sick patient’s right as well as duty to put an utimate end to the torment of himself and his family. Because he is the reason of all the suffering. Those who choose suicide are a class of people whose remaining time is nothing but simply suffering, a class of people who choose death as an ultimate escape from the eternal torture they are destined to ,a class of people who need compassion and understanding from their relatives and the society, rather than meanlessly prolonging his painful life. If we really love the one who commit suicide, we should let him die in a desired way, die with dignity as he wishes. Because this is where true love lies.

　　Judging from what has been discussed above, we can safely draw the conclusion that we should make suicide legalized. Because it’s a new and bitter truth we must learn to face.

　　That’s all.Thank you.

英语辩论赛辩论稿 篇四

　　Good morning everyone.Today I’m happy to make a discussion about paper book and E-book wit

h you. After our team seriously thinking and discussion,we agree that paper book is still the first s

　　election when people decide to read.经过我们团队认真思考和讨论，大家一致认

　　为，纸书依然是当人们决定要读取的第一个选择。

　　That means,though E-book has appeared for many years and its market is growing rapidly,paper book still occupy the first place.这意味着，尽管电子图书已经出现了许多

　　年，其市场正很快，纸质书仍然占据第一的位置。

　　Therefore,our group choose to support paper book.When compared with E-book, paper book has its natural advantages.因此，我们小组选择支持的纸质书。当与电子书相

　　比，纸书有其天然的优势。

　　Firstly,traditional culture take paper book as its carrier,this also makes traditional reading has become a habit for most people.首先，传统文化采取纸质图书为载体，这也

　　使得传统阅读对大多数人来说已经成为一种习惯。

　　We all know that once a habit developed,it will be hard to change.我们都知道，一旦习

　　惯开发的，这将是很难改变。

　　It also illustrates that the status of paper book is still hard to shake by E-book and the soul and essence of paper book are also impossible to be replaced by E-book.这也说

　　明了纸书的地位还是难以通过电子书来动摇灵魂和纸书的.精华，也不可能被电子书取代。

　　Traditional reading helps us cultivate abstract thinking ability,by contrast,E-book looks like a kind of fast food culture which lacks of depth and aftertaste.传统的阅读能

　　帮助我们培养抽象思维能力，相比之下，电子书看起来就像是一种快餐文化，而缺乏深度和 回味。

　　Secondly,E-book isn’t really conductive to collection,collection of books is also a kind of collection of culture and a historical accumulation at the same time.其次，电子书是

　　不是真的利于收藏，收藏的书籍也是一种集文化，并在同一时间一个历史积淀。

　　So,one day in the future,if what we can see in museum is not ancient books but electronic readers,such as kindle,CD,removing storage devices,don’t tell me that you still have interesting to visit.于是，有一天，在未来，如果我们能在博物馆看到的是不是古

　　代的书籍，但电子阅读器，如点燃，CD，删除存储设备，不要告诉我，你还有兴趣访问。

　　So,as far as I’m concerned,a electronic reader is always a cold machine,it cann’t bring us warm feeling like paper book.所以， 就我而言， 一个电子阅读器始终是一个冰冷的机器，

　　它无法带给我们像纸书温暖的感觉。

　　To sum up,we choose to support paper book is a right choice. 综上所述， 我们选择支持

　　纸书是一个正确的选择。