染雾我看克隆 篇一
克隆技术是一项引人注目的科学成就，它在医学、农业和科学研究等领域都有广泛的应用。然而，我对克隆技术持有一定的保留态度。本文将从伦理、社会和法律等方面探讨克隆技术的利与弊。
首先，克隆技术在伦理层面上引发了许多争议。克隆过程中使用的材料往往来自于人类或动物的细胞，这涉及到对生命的伦理问题。克隆技术是否侵犯了个体的尊严和权利是一个值得思考的问题。另外，克隆技术还可能导致人类特权的丧失，因为它可能会使得人类变得可以被复制和替代。这将给社会带来巨大的变革，可能引发一系列的道德和法律争议。
其次，克隆技术在社会层面上也存在一些问题。一方面，克隆技术的高昂成本使得其只能在少数发达国家进行研究和应用，这导致了资源的不公平分配。另一方面，克隆技术可能会加剧人口问题，因为它可能导致人类数量的快速增长。这将给社会资源的分配和环境可持续性带来巨大的挑战。
最后，克隆技术在法律层面上也存在一些困难。克隆技术的法律法规尚未完善，这给克隆技术的研究和应用带来了一系列的法律难题。例如，克隆技术是否应该受到严格的监管和限制，以及克隆产生的个体是否具有法律上的地位等等。这些问题需要通过国际社会的共同努力来解决。
综上所述，克隆技术在伦理、社会和法律等方面都存在一定的问题和挑战。虽然克隆技术在某些领域具有巨大的潜力和应用前景，但我们也不能忽视其带来的伦理和社会问题。因此，我们需要权衡克隆技术的利弊，制定合理的法律和伦理规范，以确保克隆技术的研究和应用能够更好地造福人类社会。
我看克隆 篇三
据媒体报道，美国的一家医学中心已经制造出全世界第一匹基因改良婴儿，共15名，克隆的话题又一次的被提起。
According to media reports, a medical center in the United States has produced the world's first genetically modified baby, a total of 15. The topic of cloning has been raised again.
开宗明义：我并不赞成克隆！
I don't agree with cloning!
从医学的角度看，我还是很认同美国这家医学中心的做法的，这样的话，至少新生婴儿就不会被遗传某些基因疾病了，从一定程度上来说，还可以抑制某些疾病的延续。
From a medical point of view, I still agree with the practice of this medical center in the United States, so that at least newborn babies will not be inherited from certain genetic diseases, and to a certain extent, can inhibit the continuation of certain diseases.
但是，谁又能保证克隆的新生儿不会携带什么我们目前还不能控制的的新病毒呢？这不是个危害吗？
But who can guarantee that the cloned newborn will not carry any new virus that we cannot control at present? Isn't this a hazard?
纵使有了这个，那个的好处，克隆想完全的冲破几千年历史留下的伦理道德的栅栏，还是很困难的。所以从现在大多数人的观念来看，克隆还是很难被接受的，更不要说克隆人了。
Even with the advantages of this and that, it is very difficult for cloning to break through the ethical barriers left by thousands of years of history. So from the point of view of most people now, cloning is still very difficult to accept, let alone human cloning.
我们假设一下，克隆被完全的接受了，甚至到了人人都想克隆自己的时候，那是不是就表明克隆的完全成功了呢？我想还不是的，看按“第六日”中阿诺.施瓦幸格的无助我们就明白了一切。克隆留给我们的是一大堆尚待要解决的问题和一系列的困惑。
Let's suppose that cloning is completely accepted, and even when everyone wants to clone themselves, does that mean that cloning is completely successful? I don't think so. We can see everything from Arnold Schwarzenegger's helplessness on the sixth day. What cloning leaves us is a lot of problems to be solved and a series of puzzles.
其中的一个问题就在于：在这个张扬个性的时代，克隆没有突出时代要求，而且制造的只是人的复制品，只是物质形态的复制品，这种复制品没有自己的思想，有的只是被复制者的旧思想，没有形成自己的新思想，这显然对社会的发展没有推动作用，甚至会阻碍社会的发展。
One of the problems is that in this era of publicizing personality, cloning does not highlight the requirements of the times, and what it produces is only a reproduction of human beings, but only a reproduction of material forms. This kind of reproduction has no idea of its own, some are only the old ideas of the copied, and no new ideas of its own, which obviously does not promote the development of society, or even hinder the society Will develop.
人类妄图成为造物主，担任造物的角色，必然自食恶果！据媒体报道，美国的一家医学中心已经制造出全世界第一匹基因改良婴儿，共15名，克隆的话题又一次的被提起。
If human beings want to be the creator and play the role of creator, they will inevitably eat their own bad results! According to media reports, a medical center in the United States has produced the world's first genetically modified baby, a total of 15. The topic of cloning has been raised again.
开宗明义：我并不赞成克隆！
I don't agree with cloning!
从医学的角度看，我还是很认同美国这家医学中心的做法的，这样的话，至少新生婴儿就不会被遗传某些基因疾病了，从一定程度上来说，还可以抑制某些疾病的延续。
From a medical point of view, I still agree with the practice of this medical center in the United States, so that at least newborn babies will not be inherited from certain genetic diseases, and to a certain extent, can inhibit the continuation of certain diseases.
但是，谁又能保证克隆的新生儿不会携带什么我们目前还不能控制的的新病毒呢？这不是个危害吗？
But who can guarantee that the cloned newborn will not carry any new virus that we cannot control at present? Isn't this a hazard?
纵使有了这个，那个的好处，克隆想完全的冲破几千年历史留下的伦理道德的栅栏，还是很困难的。所以从现在大多数人的观念来看，克隆还是很难被接受的，更不要说克隆人了。
Even with the advantages of this and that, it is very difficult for cloning to break through the ethical barriers left by thousands of years of history. So from the point of view of most people now, cloning is still very difficult to accept, let alone human cloning.
我们假设一下，克隆被完全的接受了，甚至到了人人都想克隆自己的时候，那是不是就表明克隆的完全成功了呢？我想还不是的，看按“第六日”中阿诺.施瓦幸格的无助我们就明白了一切。克隆留给我们的是一大堆尚待要解决的问题和一系列的困惑。
Let's suppose that cloning is completely accepted, and even when everyone wants to clone themselves, does that mean that cloning is completely successful? I don't think so. We can see everything from Arnold Schwarzenegger's helpl
其中的一个问题就在于：在这个张扬个性的时代，克隆没有突出时代要求，而且制造的只是人的复制品，只是物质形态的复制品，这种复制品没有自己的思想，有的只是被复制者的旧思想，没有形成自己的新思想，这显然对社会的发展没有推动作用，甚至会阻碍社会的发展。
One of the problems is that in this era of publicizing personality, cloning does not highlight the requirements of the times, and what it produces is only a reproduction of human beings, but only a reproduction of material forms. This kind of reproduction has no idea of its own, some are only the old ideas of the copied, and no new ideas of its own, which obviously does not promote the development of society, or even hinder the society Will develop.
人类妄图成为造物主，担任造物的角色，必然自食恶果！
If human beings want to be the creator and play the role of creator, they will inevitably eat their own bad results!
