教育硕士论文答辩经验谈 篇一
在我准备教育硕士论文答辩之前,我感到既紧张又期待。答辩是对自己多年学习成果的一次检验,同时也是展示自己研究成果的机会。在这次答辩中,我积累了一些宝贵的经验,特此分享给大家。
首先,充分准备是答辩成功的关键。在答辩前,我仔细研究了自己的论文,并准备了充分的PPT。我对每个章节的内容进行了梳理和总结,并预测了答辩委员会可能会提出的问题。我还阅读了相关的文献,以便能够回答任何与我的研究领域相关的问题。通过这样的准备,我增加了自己的自信心,也更好地回答了委员会的问题。
其次,在答辩过程中,清晰地表达自己的研究思路非常重要。在回答问题时,我尽量用简洁明了的语言来表达自己的研究内容和思路。我将研究问题的背景、目的、方法和结果都列出来,以便委员会能够更好地理解我的研究。同时,我还注意到了自己的语速和语调,避免了过于紧张和急躁的表达方式。这样的表达方式使得委员会更容易理解我的研究,也增加了答辩的效果。
最后,处理答辩委员会的批评和意见时,我保持了积极的态度。在答辩过程中,委员会可能会提出一些批评和建议,这是正常的。我在回答问题时,虚心接受委员会的批评,并且表达了自己对于委员会建议的思考。我认为这样的态度能够显示出我对于研究的责任心和学术素养,也增加了委员会对我的研究的认可度。
通过这次答辩经验,我更加明白了答辩的重要性和技巧。充分准备、清晰表达和积极接受批评是答辩成功的关键。我希望能够把这些经验分享给其他即将进行答辩的教育硕士研究生,帮助他们度过这个关键的阶段。
教育硕士论文答辩经验谈 篇二
回顾我教育硕士论文答辩的经验,我认为最重要的是保持冷静和自信。答辩是对多年学习成果的一次检验,同时也是对自己研究能力和学术素养的考验。在这个关键的时刻,保持冷静和自信是非常重要的。
首先,答辩过程中,我努力保持冷静。我深知紧张会影响到我的表现,所以我在答辩前进行了充分的准备,并且进行了一些放松的活动,如深呼吸和冥想。在答辩过程中,当我感到自己有些紧张时,我会停下来,通过深呼吸来调整自己的状态。这样的冷静态度有助于我更好地回答委员会的问题,也让我在答辩过程中更加自信。
其次,自信是答辩成功的关键。我相信自己的研究成果是有价值的,所以我在答辩中表现出了自信的态度。我清楚地表达自己的研究思路和成果,并且对于委员会的问题给予了积极的回应。我相信自己的研究是有意义的,所以我对于委员会的批评和建议也能够保持积极的态度。这种自信的态度使得委员会对我的研究更加认可,也增加了答辩的成功率。
最后,我认为答辩是一个学习和成长的机会。在答辩过程中,委员会提出的批评和建议可以帮助我更好地改进我的研究。我积极接受委员会的意见,并且将其作为自己未来研究的方向。这样的态度不仅展示了我的学术素养,也为我未来的学术发展打下了基础。
通过这次答辩经验,我明白了保持冷静和自信的重要性。答辩是一个挑战,但也是一个机会。只有保持冷静和自信,我们才能够更好地展示自己的研究成果,也才能够在答辩中取得成功。我希望我的经验能够对其他教育硕士研究生有所帮助,让他们在答辩中取得好的成绩。
教育硕士论文答辩经验谈 篇三
教育硕士论文答辩经验谈
东北师大05届温州部分教育硕士将于本月底和月初赴师大参加毕业论文答辩。很多学员对答辩的应当注意的事项不是很清楚,心理有点不安。我就本人答辩的经验,整理一些资料供大家参考。
(一)全力消化自己所写的论文
反复阅读、审查自己的论文。对论文内容要了如指掌。写好5-10 分钟的答辩陈述。陈述特别要注意以下几点:1.论文的内容、目的和意义;所采用的原始资料;2.硕士论文的基本内容及主要方法;3.成果、结论和对自己完成任务的评价,强调论文的新意与独创性。(下面附上我的英文陈述稿)
(二)物质准备:准备参加答辩会所需携带的用品:
1.硕士论文的底稿。2.答辩陈述稿。3.主要参考资料,答辩时虽然不能依赖这些资料,但带上这些资料,当遇到一时记不起来时,稍微翻阅一下有关资料,就可以避免出现答不上来的尴尬和慌乱。
(二)硕士论文答辩程序
1.研究生向答辩委员进行陈述(约5-10分钟,具体时间由答辩主席决定)。
2.答辩委员会专家(5位)提问,每人基本上有2-3个问题;
答辩老师一般的提问类型:对选题意义提问、对重要观点及概念提问、对论文新意提问、对论文细节提问、对论文数据来源提问、对论文薄弱环节提问、对建议可行性提问、对自己所做工作的提问、对超出论文范围的提问、没有标准答案的提问、对格式是否规范化的提问。
3.答辩委员会专家讨论、投票。4:1勉强通过;3:2不予通过。
整个程序大概需要一个小时。
good luck to you!
附:我的答辩陈述稿presentation
in academic year, i studied here for my med degree. a group of teachers in our college began a research program on different aspects of primary school english teaching. ms. huang, my supervisor, was responsible for the research task on primary school english teachers’ in-service education. she knew my interest in the issue of teacher development so she asked me to join in her research. because of her, it was easier for me to get the chance to attend various kinds of in-service education programs in the province.
in the same year, zhejiang province launched a project of improving teachers’ quality of primary and secondary schools in rural regions. wenzhou teachers education institute, where i am working took on the task of providing training courses to primary school english backbone teachers from rural regions around the city .as a part of the provincial project. as a teacher educator majored in english teaching, i was responsible for the whole arrangement of the training courses for these bakbone primary school english teachers.
in september , i finished my med studies and returned home. on 25th, sept of , i organized a training class for in-service primary school english teachers in rural areas and decided to take this class as my study subject.
enlightened by t
he socio-cultural view of learning, that is, teachers learn best through active involvement and through thinking about and becoming articulate about what they have learned, i arranged the whole training course to promote trainee teachers’ active participation as much as possible. for eample, i took trainee teachers to observe class and encouraged them to make a comment afterwards; i invited professor huang who guided trainee teachers to narrate their teaching eperiences in order to draw wisdom from themselves. in this sense, i named my training courses as “participatory training courses”.the training course lasts for five days, during which, i participated in as an organizer of the whole training course, a teacher educator for one subject, a peer learner of the trainee teachers, and meanwhile, a researcher. the research methods adopted in the study are ethnography, narrative inquiry, case story method, interviews and so on. the data collected include field notes of classroom observation, interview recordings, teachers’ feedback journal, and discussion groups’ recordings.
the paper attempts to answer the following questions:
(1) what kind of knowledge do teachers really need?
(2) how do teachers get developed through learning in this in-service training program?
by making a narrative inquiry of the training course, i gained a better understanding on what courses satisfy the teachers’ needs and arouse teachers’ awareness of ongoing professional development.
the study provided some effective suggestions for promoting teachers professional development in the current frame of teacher training and teacher education. this reaearch deepened my understanding on the issue of teacher education., what’s more, through the research.it is beneficial for me to orgnize other training class.